Dental remake causes and prevention
Don't fabricate on an assumption.
The impression is not the case. Neither is the scan. TrazaLab structures dental case validation: it checks configured requirements, connects clinical evidence, and keeps clinic and laboratory decisions before fabrication.
Synthetic case · TL–2841Risk map before fabrication
Surgeon · active review
Case creationThe site opens the correct branch.
The odontogram links site 11 to an anterior crown. That choice defines the prescription, evidence, and records that must exist.
Synthetic demonstration case. TrazaLab structures requirements, evidence, and decisions; it does not diagnose or guarantee the clinical outcome.
Risk does not appear on a single screen
The remake enters through different moments.
Dental remakes do not start at one point. Clinical field, geometry, impression, shade, function, and transfer can lose context before the laboratory touches design.
Clinical fieldMeshImpressionShadeFunctionTransfer
The object changes.
The question remains: what is missing, who can resolve it, and which version should the laboratory review?
Active treatmentAnterior crown · site 11
The treatment writes the protocol
What is needed appears after you choose.
The case does not start with a universal list. Site, restoration, retention, and interface open the requirements that belong to that branch.
Site prescription Shade reference Upper, lower, and bite Prep and margin evidence
See how the odontogram opens the branch Two methods. Two error chains.
With scanner or impression, the review changes.
Digital route
File, role, mesh, and context.
TrazaLab organizes the packet and opens review surfaces. Clinical accuracy remains a human decision.
See how a dental STL file is analyzedPhysical route
Impression, bite, components, and receipt.
The system keeps requirements and delivery; a person inspects the material and accepts or returns it.
Honest boundary: a valid mesh is not the same as a clinically accurate capture, and a registered impression is not the same as an accepted impression.
Geometry does not tell the whole story
Motion also enters the case.
TrazaCaptura keeps field views. TrazaTono keeps the color reference. TrazaVideo documents closure or excursion when the treatment needs it.
TrazaCaptura · field and margin TrazaTono · reference and context TrazaVideo · reviewable motion
The recording keeps motion. It does not measure force or diagnose occlusion.A visible sequence
Verification happens in order.
An early gap pauses later phases. The system explains the state without pretending it reviewed what it could not yet review.
EvidenceDoes the required evidence exist?
Clinical views are sought inside the same treatment, not in a separate thread or folder.
Correction inside the same case
What is missing returns to the owner.
The task keeps the treatment, the site, and the version. Resolving it does not create a second case or a parallel conversation.
Retained versionTL–2841 · V02
Send pendingThe shade reference is missing.
The action returns to clinical assistance with site 11 and version 02 already linked.
Same-case history
Prescription reviewed
Evidence linked to the site
Verification resumed
Accountability before production
The surgeon sends. The laboratory accepts.
Surgeon reviewSigns the version that leaves.
Laboratory receiptAccepts, returns, or documents an exception.
TL–2841 · V02
Control continues at receipt
Receiving is not fabricating.
The laboratory keeps its own sequence: receipt, available inspection, design review, fabrication record, and human release.
Receipt Packet and versionPreflight Available geometryDesign Technical decisionRelease Human review
If a remake still happens
Leave a verifiable cause.
The Remake Tracker keeps the attributed cause, subcategory, severity, and captured impact. The Remake Analyzer reviews registered cases after the event; it does not predict an outcome.
CauseAttributed marginal fit
Captured impactLaboratory + clinic
ReadingRetrospective pattern
Explicit clinical boundary
The software checks. The person decides.
Geometry, photographs, annotations, history, and version.
Correct, accept, return, sign, or document an exception.
TrazaLab makes review visible, assigned, and retained. It does not replace the scanner, the laboratory, or clinical judgment.
Scientific base
Which risk each source supports.
The literature justifies the control questions. It does not by itself prove that TrazaLab reduces remakes by a given percentage.
Remakes
40,344 indirect restorations
Records margin, contacts, fit, color, esthetics, contour, and occlusion among observed reasons. The rate belongs to that sample.
Physical impression1,157 impressions received by laboratories
Documents tissue over the margin, voids, tray pressure, and dual-arch record problems.
ScanningFactors affecting intraoral accuracy
Groups maintenance, morphology, materials, environment, strategy, execution, and verification.
MarginsSubgingival margins
The review highlights depth, retraction, dryness, and saliva as relevant variables.
ImplantsImplant scans
Includes scan body, strategy, distance, extension, number of implants, and arch characteristics.
ColorIOS-captured color
The review found high precision but lower trueness versus the spectrophotometer; it does not propose universal replacement.
BiteVirtual interocclusal records
Describes variation by system, scan extent, and alignment method.
Before you decide
Questions before fabrication.
Direct answers on scope, scanners, physical impressions, automation, and accountability.
Does TrazaLab automatically confirm that a scan is clinically accurate?
No. It can check the packet, roles, and mesh properties when analysis is available; it also offers review surfaces. Margin visibility, scan-body seating, stitching, and occlusal relationship still require clinical judgment.
See how the case is reviewedDoes it work if the clinic uses physical impressions?
Yes. The case opens a physical route with requirements, components, additional evidence, delivery reference, and receipt verification. TrazaLab does not automatically diagnose material defects: that inspection belongs to the clinic and the laboratory.
See the clinical flow without a scannerWhat does TrazaLab review before a case is sent to fabricate?
Verification walks the prescription, clinical evidence, case files, available scan quality, and the rules configured for the treatment. If it finds an incomplete requirement, it returns a concrete action to the responsible party; rework risk is shown as support for review, not as an automatic diagnosis.
Walk the full preparationIs the prevention engine artificial intelligence?
The audited mechanism is deterministic and based on rules, requirements, and explicit thresholds. This page does not present it as predictive AI or as a diagnostic system.
Does TrazaLab block every complex case?
No. Incompleteness can stop a release; inherent case risk stays separate and informative. An exception can still follow a responsible review, signature, and record flow.
How does it keep the same version between clinic and laboratory?
Each version keeps the prescription, site, evidence, files, clarifications, and send/receipt decisions inside the case. That way the laboratory reviews the current packet without rebuilding the treatment from messages, photographs, or separate attachments.
See how the laboratory receives the caseDoes it replace the scanner, the laboratory, or clinical judgment?
No. TrazaLab connects and verifies the work between them. The purpose is that the clinical decision, the records, and laboratory acceptance are explicit before fabrication.
See laboratory-facing file reviewWhat happens if a remake still occurs?
The Remake Tracker keeps the attributed cause, severity, and captured cost for retrospective analysis. That supports learning from the event without turning history into a predictive claim.
One version. Two reviews. One history.
Make what is missing visible before you fabricate.START WITH ONE CASE